About this skill

Problem

K-12 teachers often have to gather lesson plans, slides, peer-review notes, award certificates, papers, continuing education proof, and class management records from PCs, USB drives, inboxes, and chat files before promotion review. The files are scattered, inconsistently named, and gaps depend on provincial rules, making manual review slow and error-prone.

Workflow

The skill breaks promotion preparation into six steps: scan and classify files from a ZIP, drive link, or local folder into modules such as professional ethics, teaching performance, research, teaching research, continuing education, and class management; extract key details; diagnose missing items; draft a confidence-labeled promotion report; generate defense questions; and export a standard package. It asks questions in one pass, saves intermediate state, and avoids submitting, signing, inflating achievements, or fabricating certificates.

Boundaries

It is intended for K-12 promotion preparation, not university review or direct submission to education bureau systems. Teachers should review AI drafts, use only authorized personal materials, and verify current provincial policy.

Screenshots

Use Cases

Before K-12 senior promotion review, classify scattered lesson plans, slides, and certificates into six modules.
Check missing teacher materials against provincial standards and generate a remediation checklist with priorities.
Draft a confidence-labeled promotion report from existing lesson plans, papers, and class management records.
Months before review, generate mock defense questions across materials, performance, philosophy, and adaptability.

Best For

K-12 teachers preparing intermediate or senior promotion and needing scattered materials organized into a submission package.
Teachers worried about missing promotion items and needing a gap checklist based on provincial standards.
Teachers who need an initial promotion report draft from lesson plans, papers, and class activities for later editing.
Teachers preparing for defense interviews with mock questions on evidence, performance, philosophy, and adaptability.