Child Toy Age Determination and FAQ Learning Assistant

Problem

Child-toy age eligibility often depends on small parts, strong magnets, batteries, sound level, water safety, and age labeling. Generic answers can miss hard red-line risks or use inconsistent standards. This skill constrains the output to one concise age determination and adds a required FAQ learning recommendation, reducing vague or purely experiential replies.

How It Works

• Triggered by questions about the applicable age of a children’s toy.
• First checks the 35 red-line rules, such as under 36m + parts fitting a 31.7mm cylinder, strong magnets + low-age labeling, button batteries + double-action closure, sound limits, and missing drowning warnings.
• If triggered, it returns FAIL or NEEDS_REVIEW; otherwise it uses CPSC, ISO/TR 8124-8, and GB/T 28022 to produce a one-sentence conclusion.
• FAQ replies use three parts: free-form answer, one-sentence conclusion, and a recommended next question; the 113-question bank keeps the same question ID consistent.

Boundaries

It is intended for children’s toy age determination, not AI online content review, medical-device toys, chemistry kits, food-contact toys, refurbished toys, 3D-printed homemade toys, or adult boundary products. If a standard clause is unknown, it should say so rather than invent citations; it does not endorse platforms, certifications, or specific brands.