Industry Chain Reading Method: Fundamental Analysis Framework
Paste the following prompt into your AI chat to install this skill:
Please install @user_138d46ff/fundamental-analysis-ds according to https://skillhub.cn/install/skillhub.md.
About this skill
Problem It Addresses
When analyzing an unfamiliar industry, information often arrives before structure: news, single-stock performance, and short-term narratives can shape the conclusion too early. Fundamental analysis also often mixes industry-level and company-level questions, such as using single-year PE for cyclical stocks or equating high technical complexity with high profitability. Industry Chain Reading Method: Fundamental Analysis Framework aims to move the judgment process forward: ask industry structure first, then company numbers.
How the Skill Works
The skill uses a six-question framework as the main spine. It starts with classification checks, then chooses the entry point by industry type: regulatory-driven industries start at Q5, technology-driven at Q4, resource-driven at Q1, and structurally stable industries at Q2 + Q3. It then deepens the analysis through industry-chain maps, profit distribution, competitive structure, moats, and valuation methods, producing an industry judgment card.
Key steps include:
- Classification: cross-check product/service, technology path, lifecycle, geographic value-chain position, and competitive structure to avoid single-label bias.
- Six-question scan: cover size and growth, value-chain profit pool, moats, technology evolution, regulation and domestic substitution, and valuation narrative.
- Industry-chain anatomy: map nodes, relationships, representative players, and profit concentration; distinguish main lines, cross-cutting support, platforms, and technical bottlenecks.
- Profit and competition validation: use 6 profit mechanisms, 8 forces plus 1 dynamic, and 7 moat types to identify where profits are durable.
- ROIC and valuation fit: test economic returns and select PE, PB, DCF, EV/EBITDA, or industry-specific indicators by lifecycle stage.
Boundaries and Notes
This is a methodology framework, not investment advice or an automatic data source. All figures depend on public data at the analysis date; citations must state source, definition, and time point. Complex companies may need SOTP; cyclical stocks should not be judged by single-year PE alone; policy-driven domestic substitution is not automatically equivalent to investment returns.
Use Cases
- Quickly assess an unfamiliar industry using a six-question framework to produce a structured judgment card
- Map an industry chain by labeling nodes, representative players, profit concentration, and overlay relationships
- Identify profit pools by applying 6 mechanisms and 8 forces plus 1 dynamic to test moats and bargaining power
- Select valuation methods by lifecycle and cycle discipline, cross-checking PE, PB, and DCF
Best For
- Buy-side analysts who need a structured framework to research unfamiliar industries quickly
- Sell-side analysts who need to decompose company cases into chain nodes and profit pools
- Hard-tech researchers who need to assess domestic substitution stage, technology evolution, and valuation fit
- Investment learners who need to review ROIC, moats, and narrative-versus-numbers dialogue
Related Skills
Based on Hengsheng Juyuan MCP financial data, it assesses equity, bond, commodity, and overseas markets and produces sourced risk reports with allocation guidance.
Performs structured contract risk assessment, adds revision suggestions in the document, and generates a standalone review report.
A single-stock research framework that produces seven-dimension drafts, integrated analysis, scenario projections, and dual-track reference, with optional comparison and no investment advice.
Generate comprehensive, specialized, and onsite emergency plans as Word documents.