Patent and Technical Solution Novelty Assessment and Prior Art Search
Paste the following prompt into your AI chat to install this skill:
Please follow https://skillhub.cn/install/skillhub.md to install @user_a0fa6b2e/patent-novelty-assessment.
About this skill
Problem to Solve
Many technical proposals need a prior-art check before filing, internal review, or partnership. Manual literature review can miss critical differences or misread “no result” as “no prior art.” This skill focuses on the named scope of @user_a0fa6b2e/patent-novelty-assessment: turning a rough idea into a comparable technical solution and supporting novelty assessment with prior-art retrieval.
How It Works
- Frame the evaluation target: extract the core problem, structure, parameters, process, and claimed effects from a technical proposal, draft claims, or embodiment.
- Build search cues: convert technical terms into keywords, synonyms, broader concepts, and application scenarios for manual or tool-assisted literature search.
- Compare candidates: align each potential prior-art reference with the current solution and mark overlaps, differences, and effect gaps.
- Produce review material: output a novelty assessment summary for engineers and IP reviewers, not a substitute for legal advice.
Boundaries
Best suited to early R&D screening, patent disclosure drafting, and differentiation analysis. Quality depends on input; missing embodiments, parameter ranges, or figures limit the assessment. Formal patent conclusions still require a patent attorney or agent and the relevant jurisdiction.
Use Cases
- Before proposing a new structural design, draft search keywords and compare known structures to identify differences.
- When drafting a patent disclosure, decompose the solution into problem, structure, and effects, then list literature search directions.
- Evaluate whether a partner’s technical proposal resembles existing patents and prepare material for internal review.
- Organize parameter ranges in a technical solution and identify broader concepts or alternatives that may affect novelty.
Best For
- R&D engineers: determine before project approval whether their solution has distinguishable technical features over known structures.
- Patent engineers: organize technical solution elements before drafting a disclosure and form initial prior-art search cues.
- Product managers: assess technical differences in partner proposals and prepare review inputs for legal and R&D.
- Technical leads: identify potential patent risks before adopting external solutions and prioritize follow-up review.
Related Skills
Based on Hengsheng Juyuan MCP financial data, it assesses equity, bond, commodity, and overseas markets and produces sourced risk reports with allocation guidance.
Applies a six-question industry-chain framework for structured fundamental analysis of sectors, profit pools, competition, ROIC, valuation, and domestic substitution.
Performs structured contract risk assessment, adds revision suggestions in the document, and generates a standalone review report.
A single-stock research framework that produces seven-dimension drafts, integrated analysis, scenario projections, and dual-track reference, with optional comparison and no investment advice.