Legal Settlement Evaluation Framework
Paste the following prompt into your AI chat to install this skill:
Follow https://skillhub.cn/install/skillhub.md to install @user_15292d5a/yjkj-legal-settlement-evaluation-framework into your AI assistant.
About this skill
Problem It Addresses
In contract disputes, settlement-offer reviews, and decisions about whether to continue litigation, the hard part is often not a single yes/no call but the lack of a shared frame: how much exposure is at stake, how strong the evidence is, what litigation costs and timelines look like, what non-monetary terms matter, and where uncertainty remains. This skill is aimed at litigators, in-house counsel, claims teams, and business stakeholders who need a structured way to organize settlement analysis without producing legal conclusions.
How It Works
It breaks settlement evaluation into reviewable modules:
- Exposure and damages range: prompts for checking amount ranges, calculation bases, damage categories, and disputed issues.
- Evidence strength factors: fields for documents, parties, dates, probative value, and missing proof.
- Cost, time, and risk comparison: helps compare continuing litigation against accepting a resolution offer.
- Non-monetary term checklist: covers confidentiality, admissions, conduct restrictions, payment terms, and other negotiation items.
- Decision memo template: produces a client-facing or internal recommendation outline.
The workflow usually starts by confirming the goal, collecting missing facts, applying the modules, and then producing matrices, checklists, memos, or planning aids. It also flags uncertainty, deadlines, confidentiality, and ethics points that require attorney review.
Boundaries
The skill is informational workflow support only. It does not provide legal advice, create an attorney-client relationship, or replace review by qualified counsel. It does not execute code, call external APIs, access court records or legal databases, predict court outcomes, or advise a party to accept a settlement. Jurisdiction-specific rules, filing requirements, privilege, confidentiality, and professional responsibility obligations must be verified by qualified counsel.
Use Cases
- After receiving a settlement offer, compile damages range, evidence strength, litigation costs, deadlines, and an evaluation matrix.
- Before drafting a client memo, list trade-offs between accepting a settlement and continuing litigation, plus open issues and counsel review points.
- During contract-dispute negotiations, organize non-monetary terms such as confidentiality, payment terms, admissions, and conduct restrictions.
- At matter kickoff, gather facts, documents, parties, dates, jurisdiction, and audience requirements to build a structured analysis frame.
Best For
- Litigators: need a consistent frame for exposure, evidence strength, litigation costs, and settlement options.
- In-house counsel: need to compare resolution versus continued litigation and draft an internal recommendation outline.
- Claims teams: need to organize documents, deadlines, damages items, and open issues.
- Business stakeholders: need to understand settlement ranges, non-monetary terms, and risk uncertainty.
Related Skills
Switch AI from a polite executor into a skeptical thinking partner, using assumption checks, pre-mortems, and evidence gates to expose weak ideas early.
Applies research discipline, data lookup, evidence grading, red-team checks, and structured reporting to analyze AI company investment logic.
Uses Qichacha or Tianyancha MCP data and public information to score corporate credit across 12 dimensions and output a Markdown risk report.
Calculates personal injury compensation via CLI and outputs case summary, standards, line items, sources, and risk notes.