Chinese VC Pitch Deck Framework

Problem

Early Chinese VC pitch decks often have the raw inputs, but the proof points are misordered: team, data, moats, and use of funds are scattered across slides, making it hard for investors to confirm certainty in 2-4 minutes. This skill reframes the BP as a fundraising argument for the Chinese VC context: decide the stage, choose page count and key evidence, then draft module copy.

How It Works

It works from an early-stage investor perspective and covers seed / angel, Pre-A / A, B, and C+ rounds. Key steps include:
- 8 required questions: capture market, data, team, policy, and funding use in one pass.
- Deck-type judgment: choose a 10-25 page structure and emphasis by round.
- 12 modules: cover, problem / opportunity, solution, business model, TAM/SAM/SOM, metrics, competition, moat, roadmap, team, financial forecast, and funding plan.
- VC preference fit: adjust emphasis on team, data, industry position, or exit path based on investor style.

Boundaries

It is useful for strategy, module copy, and investor-style review. It does not replace financial audit, legal due diligence, or PPTX generation. Users must supply all data, disclose policy risks, and avoid invented market sizes or inflated milestones.