AI Agent Hub
Back to skills
Ramanujan Text Analysis Method icon

Ramanujan Text Analysis Method

Knowledge Management Updated 2026.08.30

Paste the following prompt into your AI chat to install this skill:

Please follow https://skillhub.cn/install/skillhub.md to install @user_231765ee/ramanujan-text-analysis.

About this skill

Problem

Short texts and commentary often shape judgment through selective presentation, ordering, and emotional framing. Reading passively can lock the analyst into the author's preset frame. This method reframes text analysis as an active structural check: first expand the information base around key nodes such as actors, timing, data, terms, sources, and events, then test the narrative by deforming, reordering, and stress-testing the text.

How It Works

The workflow is not summarization or sentiment classification. It is an inspectable process:
- Expand first: search external context for each key node and build vertical, lateral, causal, and counterfactual links.
- Holistic gaze: identify the overall emotional curve, stance, and intended reader response before getting stuck in details.
- Chunked deformation: split the text into 3–5 narrative blocks and check whether positive and negative material is structurally asymmetric.
- Structural recombination: use causal-chain reordering, evidence reordering, emotion-fact separation, and paragraph-shuffling tests to see if the conclusion depends on the author's sequence.
- Node detonation: break short text into actor, action, time, reason, data, and rhetoric, then re-examine omitted dimensions in the expanded information network.

Boundaries

It is not an automated fact-checker and does not decide what should be published. Findings still require source tracing, cross-validation, and an adversarial reread. The goal is not infinite searching, but building the smallest sufficient information network needed to judge structure. It fits short news items, statements, long commentary, multi-source material, and data-heavy texts.

Use Cases

  • Audit a short news brief for actor, timing, data, and rhetoric to find omitted cost-bearers.
  • Split a long commentary into background, accusation, evidence, emotion, and conclusion blocks to test structural symmetry.
  • Recombine claims from multiple sources on the same event to see if an alternate story can be constructed.
  • Before publishing a data-backed claim, separate emotion from facts and test whether facts alone support the conclusion.

Best For

  • Public-opinion editors who verify news statements and want to detect selective framing in short briefs.
  • Policy analysts who trace data definitions, actor history, and timing triggers in official documents.
  • Competitive or incident researchers who recombine multiple sources to test the structure of an event narrative.
  • Individual readers who want to identify emotion-driven or conclusion-first arguments before sharing.