Full-Cycle Training Project Manager

The Problem It Solves

Training project preparation usually spans requirements confirmation, instructor coordination, budgeting, on-site execution, post-training evaluation, and retrospective archiving. Without a consistent structure, checklists easily miss critical actions such as equipment rehearsal, courseware review, online interaction design, and survey follow-up. Risk plans are often added just before the review meeting, and retrospectives can drift into vague complaints instead of producing concrete, reusable actions for the next cohort.

Core Capabilities & Workflow

• Four-stage process model: Requirements Diagnosis → Solution Design → Execution & Delivery → Evaluation & Retrospective. Each stage produces a verifiable checklist with explicit owner, deadline, and status fields.
• Multi-type template switching: Covers internal training, external course dispatch, live-streaming training, workshops, new-hire onboarding, and executive programs, selecting the appropriate template based on type + scale + format.
• Budget and risk output: Includes a budget template with a 10% contingency line and a probability-impact-severity risk matrix, making the proposal easier to bring directly into a review meeting.
• Evaluation and retrospective: Structures evaluation from Kirkpatrick L1 satisfaction to L4 outcome-level indicators, and provides retrospective prompts designed to converge into explicit action commitments.
• Exception handling: Handles scenarios such as tight timelines, scale mismatch, insufficient budget, and mixed requirements-execution stages, with explicit trigger conditions and user-facing prompts to prevent users from forcing an ill-fitting template.

Boundaries & Caveats

The skill outputs plans, checklists, budget tables, risk tables, and retrospective prompts. It does not contact instructors, book venues, operate OA or LMS systems, or replace the project lead in making vendor-selection decisions. It is intended for training coordinators, HR partners, and project owners when preparing proposals, reviewing plans, running pre-execution checks, or preparing retrospectives.