HR Learning Officer
Paste the following prompt into your AI chat to install this skill:
Please follow https://skillhub.cn/install/skillhub.md to install @user_8965db71/hr-learning-officer.
About this skill
Problem
L&D teams often get stuck on reporting language: they can show “seat hours, attendance, and satisfaction,” but struggle to explain whether training changed behavior, improved performance, or produced measurable ROI. Another common issue is needs assessment by questionnaire, which produces generic goals like “English” or “PPT.” Performance problems are also often treated as training problems too early, ignoring non-learning factors such as process, incentives, or tooling.
How It Works
The skill organizes work around knowledge cards, value proof, maturity upgrades, and performance improvement, shifting learning operations from delivery to evidence:
- Knowledge cards: Pick a topic from the theme library, generate a 200–300-word card using “problem → concept → case,” check recent duplicates with
memory_search, then push to IMA; if push fails, save to a local daily note and mark it for follow-up. - Value proof: Diagnose whether current assessment reaches
L1satisfaction,L2learning,L3behavior,L4results, orL5 ROI; identify gaps and audience needs; prioritize key projects; enforceL3behavior metrics; calculate training contribution using the Phillips ROI formula and an effect isolation coefficient; then rewrite the report in business language. - Maturity upgrades: Assess training maturity Level and eight capability anchors, then choose an
L1→L2,L2→L3, orL3→L4migration path, including metric switching, manager support mechanisms, and quick wins. - Performance improvement: Run three-layer root-cause analysis first; if the issue comes from environment, process, incentives, or org design, prefer non-training fixes such as workflow optimization, tool upgrades, or incentive redesign before proposing courses.
Boundaries And Notes
- ROI output must state assumptions: The skill discourages giving an “average ROI percentage,” because each project has different baselines, contexts, and isolation factors.
- L3 cannot be skipped: If behavior assessment is incomplete or the assessment chain is not marked as broken, do not move directly to
L4results or ROI calculation. - Card workflow has checkpoints: Topic selection and content require user confirmation before generation or push.
- Best for enterprise L&D, HR training, performance improvement, and CLO role transitions; without business data, behavior metrics, or baselines, value proof will remain limited to diagnosis and solution design.
Use Cases
- Design L3 behavior metrics for an annual sales training project and output reportable ROI assumptions with an effect isolation coefficient.
- Turn fragmented training topics into problem-concept-case cards, check 30-day duplicates, and push confirmed cards to IMA.
- Diagnose a training system with high satisfaction but weak behavior change, select an L2-to-L3 path, and design manager support mechanisms.
- Run three-layer root-cause analysis for performance decline, identifying process, incentive, or tooling issues before deciding on a course.
Best For
- Enterprise L&D managers who must present training budget impact to executives using behavior change and ROI.
- HRD or CLO roles moving training systems from course delivery toward performance and strategic alignment.
- HRBPs investigating business performance declines and needing to distinguish non-training root causes before prescribing courses.
- HR operations or knowledge-management staff who need scheduled HR knowledge cards and IMA push workflows.
Related Skills
A Chinese early-stage VC pitch-deck framework covering stage judgment, 12 core sections, investor preferences, and policy risk disclosure.
A requirement alignment workflow that connects clarification, PRD generation, dual-panel Demo-PRD linkage, annotation write-back, and acceptance closure.
A local-life operations assistant for diagnosing bottlenecks and structuring group-buy, livestream, influencer, private-domain, and review plans.
Compare eight popular cross-border company jurisdictions on cost, tax, setup flow, and platform fit, then output recommendations, a comparison table, and registration checklist.