E-Commerce Livestream Legal and Tax Risk Control Plus

Problem

E-commerce, livestreaming, and MCN compliance risks are spread across civil liability, administrative penalties, tax inspections, and rules for data, minor protection, labor, and content. Manual review can miss overlapping issues such as platform responsibility, ad identifiability, influencer settlement, private-account revenue, and bonded or direct-mail cross-border tax obligations.

How It Works

The skill produces a structured risk report in a cautious legal-assistant style. Key steps:
- Identify the business model—platform, self-operated, talent/influencer, MCN, cross-border, or service-based—and product category, such as food, cosmetics, medical devices, or financial recruitment.
- When a business entity is provided, use qcc-company and yuandian-mcp to check registration, qualifications, litigation, penalties, statutory validity, and cases.
- Analyze civil, administrative, tax, other, and compliance advice layers, with a mandatory risk summary before detailed analysis that lists all 🔴 high-risk items first.
- Expand the highest-risk layer with statutes, cases, liability allocation, and administrative-to-criminal exposure; summarize lower-risk layers briefly.

Boundaries

It is suitable for lawyers, legal teams, MCNs, and operators doing compliance screening, regulatory response planning, or pre-investment due diligence, but it does not replace accountants, tax advisors, or formal legal opinions. If no entity is provided, qualification, penalty, and litigation facts cannot be verified; if MCP balance is insufficient, statutes and cases require manual review.