Bid Rejection Risk Radar

Problem

Bid rejection risks are often scattered across tender notices, qualification criteria, evaluation rules, contract terms, and format requirements. Some are explicit—star clauses, maximum price caps, deposit deadlines—while others are implicit: mismatched dates, unit inconsistencies, nested conditions, or vague approval language. Manual review can miss items and rarely produces a checklist that can be verified before sealing the bid.

How It Works

The skill accepts tender documents such as PDF, DOCX, images, or scanned files. Its goal is to extract clauses that may lead to rejection, not to interpret the whole document or make legal judgments. It outputs a unified 10-column checklist with risk point, clause source, requirement, risk level, confidence, and check action. The workflow covers:
- identifying electronic or paper bidding and multiple packages;
- validating input completeness and readability of key clauses;
- scanning six dimensions and mining hidden risks with a four-step method;
- anchoring key clauses to the relevant legal system and checking cross-clause conflicts.
Uncertain items are marked as [not found in source / manual check needed].

Boundaries

This skill does not draft bid documents, review contracts, design pricing strategy, or replace the evaluation committee. It is best used as a structured pre-bid risk check, with final verification still done by the bidder, legal counsel, or responsible review team.