Ruankao Senior Essay Scoring
Paste the following prompt into your AI chat to install this skill:
Please install @user_d5aa69c2/ruankao-essay-scoring according to https://skillhub.cn/install/skillhub.md.
About this skill
Problem
Ruankao senior essay grading is often too subjective for candidates. The paper section has 75 total points and a 45-point pass line, but examinees frequently do not know which dimension caused the loss: incomplete sub-question coverage, weak project evidence, missing quantitative data, short abstracts, or vague technical depth. ruankao-essay-scoring turns subjective feedback into a dimension-by-dimension scoring report, with scores, deduction reasons, and actionable revision advice.
How It Works
The skill first confirms the target qualification—System Architect by default, with support for Systems Project Manager, System Analyst, Network Architect, and Systems Planner—then loads the matching references/scoring-rubric*.md file. Key steps include:
- Clarify the topic: If only the essay is provided, it asks for the original exam question, including its three sub-questions.
- Count the body: It extracts the main text excluding the abstract and reports the Chinese character count.
- Run the seven-question check: It verifies whether the essay answers core questions about project background, solution design, implementation, pitfalls, and measured results.
- Score five dimensions: It evaluates topic alignment, applied depth, practicality, writing clarity, and structure/completeness.
- Diagnose revisions: It checks whether the total reaches the 45-point pass line and focuses improvement plans on the weakest dimensions.
The output is structured rather than generic: each dimension includes a score, deduction reasons, and concrete suggestions, making it useful for iterative essay revision.
Boundaries
This skill is focused on scoring and diagnosis, not full ghostwriting. If the user needs writing guidance, pair it with ruankao-essay-writing. Accurate evaluation depends on the provided exam question and complete essay; without the topic, topic alignment cannot be judged reliably. Common dimensions are shared across qualifications, but applied depth uses qualification-specific rubrics, so the correct detail file must be selected.
Use Cases
- A candidate submits a complete essay and topic and needs a dimension score report.
- A user posts only the essay, so the skill asks for three sub-questions first.
- A reviser resubmits a draft and needs a before/after comparison to verify fixes.
- A candidate requests a practicality check to find missing metrics and revision advice.
Best For
- Candidates preparing System Architect essays who want dimension-level deduction reasons.
- Senior Ruankao candidates resubmitting drafts to verify whether fixes improved the score.
- Candidates diagnosing weak practicality or topic fit and locating missing content.
- Candidates checking whether abstracts and essay structure meet official requirements.
Related Skills
A five-phase coaching workflow for career positioning, resume optimization, mock interviews, offer comparison, and salary negotiation.
Recommends introductory philosophy books by school and explains abstract concepts through everyday examples.
Reviews CET, postgraduate, and IELTS essays paragraph by paragraph without a prompt, adding scores, a 7.5-level rewrite, and bilingual comparisons.
Pushes daily Zizhi Tongjian entries with original text, translation, and analysis, and supports jumping by volume or year, searching people or events, and tracking progress.