Ad Compliance and Consumer Rights Protection AI Review Plus

Problems It Addresses

Before launch, legal and business teams must review ad copy, product detail pages, and live-stream scripts for absolute claims, efficacy language, portrait and name usage, pricing statements, and sector-specific rules. Manual review depends on regulation versions, case law, and institutional habits, and outputs often vary between legal advice and copy review. This skill fixes that workflow and reduces missed items and wording drift.

How It Works

• Path A: legal consultation: classify the issue, search local files under references/, then optionally verify through Huayu Yuandian MCP and official web sources, and output conclusions, legal bases, risks, and uncertainties.
• Path B: ad copy review: split copy by sentence, detect product category, determine whether the text is a commercial advertisement, scan risks, check authorization for names, portraits, and trademarks, list statutory penalty ranges, and produce a compliant rewrite.
• Report output: supports .docx generation with the requirement that the document matches the final conversational report in structure, numbering, wording, and content, avoiding drift caused by field remapping.

Boundaries and Caveats

• The local knowledge base is stated as collected through June 2026; newer rules, judicial interpretations, or enforcement guidance may require external verification.
• The skill asks users to verify corporate qualifications, trademark rights, permits, and licenses; it does not perform a full qualification audit by default.
• Penalty analysis states statutory ranges rather than predicting case-specific amounts, and conclusions still depend on complete facts, evidence, and adjudicative discretion.