Wrong Answer Organizer Assistant

What It Solves

Wrong-answer review often stops at copying problems: questions are scattered, error causes are unclear, and revision has no rhythm. This skill is for problems the user already knows were answered incorrectly. It helps turn loose mistakes into trackable study material. It does not judge whether an answer is correct or replace question banks. Instead, it structures the workflow around “what went wrong, why it went wrong, and what to practice next.”

How It Works

The skill first normalizes the input into stable fields: the question, the wrong answer, the correct answer, the subject, and the relevant knowledge points. Then it enters an analysis layer, distinguishing conceptual errors, calculation errors, reading-comprehension errors, and method-selection errors. It also labels knowledge points, difficulty, and importance, then groups entries by subject or topic so weak areas are easier to track.

It can also generate similar practice problems based on the identified error type and create a revision plan, including spaced review aligned with the Ebbinghaus forgetting curve, such as 1-day, 3-day, 7-day, and 14-day reminders. Compared with simple note-taking, the skill emphasizes “root-cause analysis + transfer practice + follow-up review,” making it useful for routine wrong-answer review in math, physics, English, and similar subjects.

Usage Boundaries

The user needs to provide the question text and answer information. Image recognition is not supported. If only the question is given without the wrong and correct answers, the skill has less material for diagnosing the real cause of the error. It is not suitable for grading assignments, looking up answers, or bulk drilling. Generated problems are for reinforcement and may differ from real exam items, so a standard question bank should still be used alongside them. Users should save the organized results themselves. The skill uses the submitted wrong-answer information only for the current analysis.