YV Patent Inventive Step Reply Generator

Problem

In patent office actions, a common issue is that the examiner concludes the claimed invention lacks inventive step. Drafting a convincing response usually requires repeatedly tracing claims, cited prior art, distinguishing features, and the chain of reasoning for non-obviousness. This skill targets that workflow and aims to extract features that can support inventive step, then organize a response centered on amended independent claim 1.

How it works

• Zero-interaction flow: after the documents are provided, it proceeds through six stages without asking for confirmation.
• Feature selection: it identifies candidate distinguishing technical features, then outputs five features ranked by inventive-step contribution, with original text and figure marks where present.
• Comparison and argumentation: it analyzes technical field, problem, solution, and effect, and generates a 1,200–1,800 Chinese-character argument for each feature in temp_opinion.md.
• Claim amendment: it merges dependent claims containing the selected features into claim 1, preserves the remaining dependent claims, and produces final_opinion.md and a DOCX file.

Scope

It depends on the supplied text materials and is well suited for mechanical, product, or structural patents needing inventive-step response drafts. Before filing, verify claim references, factual accuracy, legal strategy, and formal document formatting.