JoyEdit Academic AI Trace Removal
Paste the following prompt into your AI chat to install this skill:
Please follow https://skillhub.cn/install/skillhub.md and install @user_654514e9/joyedit.
About this skill
Problem It Solves
Chinese academic text rewritten by LLMs often leaves three kinds of traces: inflated significance, mechanically uniform sentence rhythms, and chatbot-style formatting residue. Phrases such as “In the era of...”, “not only... but also...”, “quality and efficiency”, “double-edged sword”, and lists like “First, theoretical basis: ...” can make a paper look like generic model output rather than peer-reviewed scholarly writing. JoyEdit Academic AI Trace Removal treats these issues as rewriting constraints instead of performing simple synonym substitution.
How It Works
The skill calibrates toward CSSCI/core-journal style and runs an auditable rewrite process:
- Detect AI patterns: scans 33 Chinese LLM writing traits, including grand narratives, vague citations, parallelism stacking, promotional wording, passive constructions, and fragmented paragraphs.
- Reconstruct logic chains: replaces surface connectives such as “not only / but also” or “first / second / finally” with more stable academic relations such as causality, elaboration, and contrast.
- Unify terms and subjects: keeps core concepts consistent and fixes subject-deficient sentences so claims read as author-owned judgments.
- Clean formatting: merges very short paragraphs, and removes mechanical bolding, colon-led lists, metaphorical quotation marks, and emojis.
- Run dual audits: produces a Draft rewrite, performs two self-audit passes, and returns a Final rewrite plus Summary of changes.
Boundaries
It is best used for literature reviews, introductions, mechanism analyses, and discussion sections where the underlying argument is already complete. The goal is to reduce AI-sounding phrasing and assistant-like expressions, not to add experimental evidence, verify data, or invent citations. If the source contains incorrect references, missing context, or weak evidence, the rewrite may preserve those scholarly risks; manual verification of terms, data, and citations is still required before formal submission.
Use Cases
- A social-science graduate student revises an introduction and removes grand narratives and forced parallelism.
- A PhD researcher cleans up a literature review before submission by fixing vague citations and chatbot-style colon lists.
- An editorial editor screens a manuscript for fragmented paragraphs, mechanical bolding, metaphorical quotes, and promotional wording.
- A researcher rewrites an LLM-generated mechanism analysis into consistent, subject-explicit Chinese academic prose.
Best For
- Humanities and social-science graduate students: need to turn AI-rewritten paper sections into peer-review-ready academic prose.
- PhD researchers or early-career scholars: need to remove AI-sounding phrasing, vague attribution, and fragmented paragraphs before submission.
- Journal editors: need to flag LLM formatting residue and boilerplate quickly, then organize actionable revision notes.
- Academic writers: need to rewrite discussion and conclusion sections into restrained, precise, terminology-consistent text.
Related Skills
A multi-platform writing workflow for WeChat that emphasizes information gain, scannability, SEO/GEO, and localization to produce verifiable, high-signal blog posts.
Search YiQiXiu electronic album templates for brochures, product manuals, magazines, mobile albums, portfolios, and meeting materials, returning preview links and page views.
Generate structured company strategic planning reports from policy, industry, competitor, and internal data, with Markdown and DOCX output.
Rewrites MD, PDF, or TXT material into a mobile-friendly WeChat article with title candidates, outline, and self-check.