Research Idea Generation and Evaluation

Problem

Researchers often rely on ad-hoc inspiration and lack a reusable pipeline for judging new directions: what has already been done, how feasible the work is, and how to avoid repeated brainstorming. researchideation treats research ideas as objects that can be generated, evaluated, and tracked. It keeps literature notes, idea candidates, and evaluation conclusions in one Markdown ledger for later review.

How it works

• Literature baseline first: read 05-文献库/ notes, extract each paper's direction and core claim, write them into 索引.md, and identify uncovered gaps.
• Systematic idea generation: use documented methods, the existing index, and literature gaps to propose candidates, then register them as 待评估.
• Evaluation white paper: run multiple web searches, check adjacent work and competing directions, and produce score, risks, comparison, and recommendation.
• Status transitions: move ideas through 待评估, 评估中, 进行中, and 已归档, syncing the index and folders at each step.

Boundaries

It suits academic researchers organizing directions, assessing projects, and maintaining a research ledger. It does not replace experiments, writing, or peer review. Quality depends on literature notes and search results, so scores should stay conservative rather than promotional.