Meeting Judge
Paste the following prompt into your AI chat to install this skill:
Follow https://skillhub.cn/install/skillhub.md to install @user_1f46f626/meeting-judge.
About this skill
Problem: meeting tools often skip the key question
Most meeting helpers assume a meeting has to happen, then optimize the agenda, notes, and attendees. The larger cost is often information sync, unnecessary attendees, and recurring inertia. Meeting Judge front-loads the decision: determine whether the meeting is worth holding, then choose hold, cancel, async, or trim.
How it works: three read-only review paths
It routes the request into one of three flows:
- Pre-review: uses the topic, agenda, attendees, and expected duration, labels items as info_sync, decision, brainstorm, or conflict, and calls necessity_score.py for a deterministic score. 0–40 points to cancel or async, 41–70 to trim, and 71–100 to hold.
- Post-review: when Tencent Meeting data is available, it reads transcripts, minutes, and attendance reports to estimate how much was pure information sync, who stayed silent, and how long real decisions took, then quantifies saved minutes, headcount, and cost.
- Recurring review: for recurring meetings, it checks whether several consecutive sessions lacked substantive decisions and recommends lowering frequency or cancellation.
The output is a verdict-style report plus structured JSON. The skill is read-only: it does not create, reschedule, cancel, or remove attendees. If auth or CLI dependencies are unavailable, it can fall back to pasted minutes. It is not a meeting-notes replacement, savings estimates are rough, and meeting_id should never be exposed to users.
Use Cases
- Before creating a project kickoff, assess whether the topic, agenda, and attendees support a live meeting or async review.
- After a meeting, use Tencent Meeting transcripts and attendance data to estimate information sync time and unnecessary attendees.
- For recurring standups or weekly meetings, check recent sessions for lack of decisions and recommend biweekly cadence or cancellation.
- Before a cross-functional review, score necessity with structured features and propose hold, trim, or async alternatives.
Best For
- Engineering leads who often run project kickoff meetings and want to filter out async-discussable topics beforehand.
- Product managers who manage weekly meeting cadence and need to detect whether recurring meetings have become habitual.
- Operations coordinators handling cross-team collaboration who want evidence for async review or a shorter agenda before inviting people.
- Team leads reviewing the value of Tencent Meeting sessions who want read-only data to decide whether to meet again.
Related Skills
Convert teaching schedules from talent development plan PDFs into structured Excel files, with cross-page tables, merged cells, multi-semester course splitting, major metadata extraction, and batch output.
Turn post-meeting text into bilingual minutes, preserving structure and consistent terminology.
Interprets tender files, generates bid docs, and checks compliance via the Bailian API.
Create, repair, and recalculate xlsx, xlsm, csv, or tsv workbooks with formula-safe edits, validation, and recalculation.