Stock Analysis Master

Problem It Addresses

Stock judgments often mix different tasks: one question may ask about direction, another may compare several tickers, and another may focus on fundamentals or valuation. A generic answer can splice MACD, ROE, and fund flow into unsupported conclusions, causing correct timing but wrong selection, or inconsistent comparison scopes. This skill targets individual A-share analysis and separates the task into stock selection, market timing, and sentiment/capital flow. It also clarifies whether the request is a single-name deep dive or a multi-name comparison.

How It Works

It first detects intent: comprehensive comparison, technical analysis, financial analysis, or valuation analysis. If the user asks “who is better,” it defaults to comprehensive comparison; if the user mentions moving averages, RSI, or entry/exit points, it weights technical signals more heavily. Data collection relies on daxiapi-cli and related xiapi analysis for market snapshots, financial quality, sector momentum, candlestick patterns, and main capital flow. In comparison mode, it aligns the time window, reporting period, and metric definitions to avoid distortions such as comparing annual data for one name against quarterly data for another. The output is conclusion-first: it states the rating and stage, then lists financials, trend structure, volume-price relations, stop-loss, and target levels, with extra risk or ST analysis when triggered.

Scope and Cautions

It suits 2-8 A-share tickers for side-by-side review, or one stock for long-term value or short-term timing analysis. It is not intended for US stocks, HK stocks, funds, futures, crypto, missing tickers, immediate position orders, or purely theoretical questions. When data is incomplete, it degrades the analysis boundary instead of filling missing fields; all conclusions retain risk warnings and disclaimers.