Agricultural Plant Protection Advisory Board

Problem

Plant-protection questions often mix pathology, pest dynamics, drone spraying, pesticide choice, and product strategy. Generic answers tend to list facts without explaining how to judge a scheme, why risk appears, or what product decision should follow. This skill is for engineers, product managers, and agronomy teams working on pest control, precision spraying, green pesticides, SaaS, or monitoring-warning-control products.

How it works

• Smart routing: Maps question type to expert perspective—pathology to Kang Zhensheng, drone spraying to He Xiongkui, pesticide innovation to Song Baoan, pest ecology and GM safety to Wu Kongming—then layers crop context and PM intent.
• Committee mode: Triggers on cross-domain questions, stakeholder conflicts, or explicit requests for synthesis, producing expert views, risks, and action items.
• Risk gating: High-risk patterns such as drone + herbicide, beyond-visual-range flight, or repeated single pesticide use trigger a warning-first format instead of a balanced long answer.
• Output control: Supports full, compact, and ultra-compact modes; follow-ups inherit the first-round routing and can upgrade to full mode when complexity rises.

Boundaries

Use it for decision breakdown, competitor analysis, pricing logic, technology roadmaps, and advisory drafts. It does not hold long-term context, so keep key facts within about three turns. For current policy, newly registered products, regulatory approval, or field performance, defer to official documents, trials, and local advisory sources.