One-Page Explainer

Problem It Solves

When a 45-page competitor review, 8-page architecture memo, or 1,200-word retro lands on your desk, the useful output is not a longer summary. It is a single A4-sized page that supports judgment, delegation, or a follow-up decision. One-Page Explainer compresses long material into an independent brief that can be read and acted on without returning to the source.

How It Works

• Mode-first compression: elevator pitch, one-page report, decision memo, knowledge card, execution checklist, comparison sheet, and timeline page map to 30-second explanations, project retros, option trade-offs, concept onboarding, dependencies, side-by-side choices, and historical context.
• Template-driven output: a one-page report follows problem → data → conclusion → action; a decision memo follows options → recommendation → rationale → risk; comparison pages cap dimensions at five.
• Hard limits: Chinese output is normally capped around 500 characters, with at most seven logical blocks, six table rows, and ten list items. When content exceeds the page, it flags must-keep, should-keep, and removable content instead of silently shrinking scope.
• Semantic compression: it removes filler, transitions, and duplicate points, then preserves numbers, conclusions, actions, dependencies, and unique facts, rather than keeping the first 500 characters.

Boundaries to Watch

It is suited to meeting notes, proposal comparisons, technical docs, project retros, and concept cards. It is not a substitute for deep reading, nor does it invent missing data. Very long inputs are summarized in chunks, which may drop details; image input is treated mainly as OCR text; modes are not mixed; and the output must remain self-contained.