Commercial Franchise Dispute QA and Court Cases Plus

Problem

Franchise disputes often mix contract validity, termination rights, fee refunds, filing compliance, and criminal-civil boundaries. This skill turns those questions into a verifiable legal workflow for common commercial franchise issues, rather than giving generic legal commentary.

How it works

• It first collects region, time range, and franchisor name to scope case search and due diligence.
• Static knowledge comes from references/, including regulations, filing rules, judicial interpretations, court guides, and case databases such as the Supreme People's Court cases and regional case topics.
• When regulations or cases are missing, it can use law_vector_search, case_vector_search, and related MCP tools to fill gaps; company due diligence may combine registration, equity, litigation, and administrative penalty data.
• The output keeps a fixed structure: define the issue, give conclusion, basis, risk, and open items. Before delivery, hall_detect checks whether cited provisions, case numbers, and holdings are consistent, avoiding unverified claims.

Limits

• It supports legal research, issue mapping, and retrieval assistance, but does not replace formal advice from a licensed lawyer.
• Cited cases require source URLs; court Q&A, press reports, and lawyer-authored views are labeled separately and still need primary-source verification.
• Company checks depend on MCP responses. If data is unavailable, the result should say so instead of generating registration or penalty facts.