General Review for Hazardous Construction Plans

Problem to solve

In reviews of hazardous sub-item construction plans, the highest-risk issue is not minor wording, but rigid defects that can cause immediate rejection: missing risk identification, missing safety guarantee measures, use of prohibited techniques, or invalid specification references. This skill targets stage 4 of construction-plan-reviewer, filtering out generic red-line problems before deeper review.

How it works

The core capability is turning generic checks into an executable checklist:
- Serious defect red lines: verify the 17 generic clauses from the MOHURD defect list and locate likely plan sections, such as project overview, risk grading, site layout, acceptance requirements, and emergency response.
- Prohibited and restricted technologies: check both the first and second batch catalogs, 45 items in total, using keywords such as mortar spacer blocks, bamboo scaffold, and bitumen sheet waterproofing, and verify restriction conditions.
- Specification and hazard rules: quickly verify specification validity and apply the 2024 major hidden hazard rules, focusing on high-risk entries such as excavation, formwork support, lifting machinery, and confined spaces.

Boundaries

This skill is a generic review node, not a standalone review entry. Specialized plans such as formwork-support-review, excavation-review, and scaffold-review should call the corresponding skills. If the plan only covers general sub-item works, the red-line screen should still return to the overall workflow to decide whether specialist review is required.