Comparable Company Valuation Analysis

Problem

Valuation work for IPO pricing, M&A, fundraising, and market-cap diagnosis usually depends on comparable companies, financials, sector multiples, and scenario assumptions. Manual data collection can miss inputs, mix data definitions, or make citations hard to verify, reducing reviewability and reproducibility.

Workflow

• Input: provide target company and analysis purpose; optional fields include listed status, industry classification, market, market-cap range, and data cutoff.
• Data collection: uses Hang Seng Juyuan MCP to retrieve target-company profile, financials, comparable companies, and cross-validation data; for unlisted targets with missing financials, it asks first and only estimates if the user declines, with explicit labeling.
• Valuation: applies Bear, Base, and Bull scenarios using growth, margin, macro, and multiple assumptions, then tests sensitivity to interest rates, FX, growth, and margin.
• Reporting: produces Chinese Markdown, HTML, and PDF outputs with citation markers and a final Data Source table; uncited or unavailable data must not be marked.

Boundaries

It supports comparable-company valuation drafting for A-shares, HK, US, or all markets, but does not replace due diligence, audit, or formal valuation opinions. Results depend on MCP data availability, completeness of target information, and disclosed assumptions; unlisted companies may require user-supplied financial or business data.