Telecom Procurement Materials Compliance Audit

Problem

Telecom procurement materials are often split across bidding documents, meeting approvals, public notices, and contracts. A single file may look compliant, while cross-stage records diverge on project name, amount, procurement method, supplier, scope, or service unit price. Manual review also has to handle tax-inclusive versus tax-exclusive amounts, service price comparisons, and differences between draft contracts in bids and final contracts. This skill turns that review into rule-based checks.

How It Works

It first extracts text from PDF, DOCX, PPTX, or TXT files and classifies each document. Classification uses file names, keywords, and section structure, and it reports confidence and evidence. Low-confidence cases should be confirmed by a human. After classification, it runs type-specific rule scans: bidding documents cover fair competition, rejection clauses, qualification conditions, technical parameters, bidding procedure, contract clauses, and antitrust issues; meeting materials check procurement method, budget basis, decision process, and scope; notice materials check publication period, result notice, and objection channels; contracts check clause and procedure compliance. For multi-file audits, it orders documents by procurement stage and compares key fields. It detects tax-inclusive and tax-exclusive amounts, converts them using a 6% VAT rate before comparison, and checks service unit prices line by line. Amount variance is graded as normal at ≤10%, medium risk at 10%-20%, and high risk above 20%. The output includes JSON, a Markdown summary, and a styled HTML report for review or reporting.

Boundaries

This skill is designed around China Telecom procurement rules and the bundled YAML rule set, so it fits structured bid, approval, notice, and contract materials. Results depend on text extraction quality; scanned documents with poor OCR may miss details. If the applicable tax rate, amount basis, or procurement policy falls outside the predefined rules, human review is required. It is a pre-check and evidence-organization tool, not a final legal or procurement compliance decision.