Scaffolding Construction Plan Review Checklist
Paste the following prompt into your AI chat to install this skill:
Please install @user_d9e8cccd/scaffold-review using https://skillhub.cn/install/skillhub.md.
About this skill
Problem to Solve
Scaffolding construction plans often contain all required sections while still missing the details that matter: foundation capacity, cantilever height, tie members, safety devices, acceptance criteria, and emergency supplies may sit in different chapters. Manual review can miss defects or cite superseded codes. scaffold-review focuses on reviewing these plans with scaffold-specific checklists rather than generic writing templates.
How It Works
The skill organizes review around nine sections: project overview, basis of preparation, construction plan, construction methods and techniques, safeguards, staffing and responsibilities, acceptance requirements, emergency response, and calculations with drawings. Core capabilities include:
- Severe defect screening: flags issues such as insufficient bearing capacity of foundations or attached structures, missing load-relief measures for tall free-standing or cantilever scaffolds, missing critical design requirements for non-standard suspended platforms, and excessive cantilever height in attached climbing scaffolds without strengthening.
- Section-by-section checks: verifies scaffold type, erection height, materials and equipment, labor, work procedures, fall protection, temporary electricity, monitoring and early warning, certified workers, acceptance content, and emergency organization.
- Code version checks: prompts verification of current references such as
GB 51210-2016,JGJ 130-2011,JGJ 202-2010, andJGJ/T 128-2019, reducing reliance on obsolete standards. - Cross-section consistency checks: uses
grep-style cross-comparison to align parameters, calculations, drawings, dates, monitoring points, and acceptance criteria.
Boundaries
It supports review of scaffold-specific construction plans and does not replace structural calculations, licensed engineer sign-off, or local regulatory approval. Where general clauses, experience-based techniques, or cross-discipline chapters are needed, the source material points to construction-plan-review-general and construction-plan-review-experience, so those resources or project context must be consulted.
Use Cases
- When reviewing free-standing or cantilever scaffold plans, use the severe-defect list to check foundation capacity, load relief, and excessive cantilever height.
- Check the basis section for current references such as GB 51210-2016 and JGJ 130-2011 to prevent superseded standards from entering the plan.
- Compare erection height, tie member parameters, and brace layout across the construction plan, methods, calculations, and drawings to find cross-section inconsistencies.
- When reviewing suspended platform or attached climbing scaffold plans, verify fall arrest, overturning calculations, safety locks, acceptors, and emergency supplies.
Best For
- Construction project technical leads who need to identify severe defects and missing items before scaffold plan review or expert discussion.
- Safety and quality managers who need to check erection, dismantling, safety devices, monitoring, acceptance, and emergency response across nine sections.
- Supervision or consulting engineers who need to align code references, calculations, drawings, and narrative requirements for scaffold plans.
- Scaffold subcontracting engineers who need to verify erection parameters, foundation capacity, and suspended platform design during bidding, construction, or acceptance preparation.
Related Skills
Reads conversation-trace files to generate an animal- or mythology-based soul mirror card and Johari Window insights.
A Deling knowledge-base research workflow that clarifies intent, runs broad and vertical searches, supplements with web sources, validates diversity, and traces key claims.
A SiYuan knowledge-base management skill for double-link parent indexes, MOCs, numbered documents, tags, repo sync, and WeChat import workflows.
A structured workflow for academic literature reviews, covering multi-database search, screening, thematic synthesis, citation validation, and PDF output.