Word Template Format Brush

Problem

Chinese bid documents, proposals, and business long-form Word files often already contain headings, body text, tables, and numbering, but the fonts, sizes, line spacing, margins, headers, and footers are inconsistent. Manually brushing formats can miss run-level overrides, table borders, section properties, and header media, or it can mix template styles with source styles. This skill targets bid books, proposals, and recommendation documents, migrating the layout of a reference template into a target Word file without rewriting the content.

How It Works

It runs a fixed sequence: it checks dependencies such as python-docx and lxml, then learns the user-provided .docx or .doc template. The learning covers heading levels, body paragraph profile, headers and footers, page setup, and style conflicts. It merges Normal style definitions with actual body run formatting, prefers the visible run-level result, and writes Chinese fonts, Western/digit fonts, size, line spacing, first-line indent, and alignment explicitly into the output.

During formatting, it detects numbered headings such as 1, 1.1, and 1.1.1, maps them to the heading styles that actually exist in the template, preserves table text with basic grid borders and cell margins, and copies template sections, themes, font tables, headers, footers, and related media. It then outputs a formatted .docx, a processing report, and a structural QA report, and recommends rendering a PDF to check clipped text, table overflow, and broken headers or footers.

Limits

It is useful for layout migration, not for rewriting content, inventing missing cover pages, approval pages, or tables of contents. Complex tables, image layout, oversized pages, and missing business fields still require manual review.