Municipal Engineering Expert Team
Paste the following prompt into your AI chat to install this skill:
Please follow https://skillhub.cn/install/skillhub.md to install @hongnan/municipal.
About this skill
Problem
Municipal engineering review often spreads across road, drainage, geotechnical, traffic and electromechanical, cost, safety, and quality disciplines. Manual coordination can miss underground utility clashes, allow conflicting conclusions, use inconsistent quota or material-price baselines, and leave safety-risk findings without a clear owner. This expert pack organizes that multi-discipline review into a repeatable workflow instead of acting as a single Q&A tool.
How It Works
It uses a Team-based multi-agent structure. The Chief General Engineer coordinates triage, then dispatches roles for road, drainage, structural geotechnics, traffic and electromechanical systems, cost and contract, and safety and quality. A typical run follows:
- Triage the project request and decide which disciplines are needed.
- Review underground utilities, clash relationships, cross-discipline constraints, and key risks in parallel.
- Resolve conflicts between professional opinions, then process cost, contract, safety, and quality serially.
- Produce a merged review opinion with professional sign-off-style conclusions.
The built-in base skill municipal-engineering-expert-group provides 19 review and cost tools. It supports underground utility comprehensive review, clash scanning, cost estimation, quota-based pricing, bill of quantities export, and 31-province material unit-price lookup with a cost database.
Boundaries
It depends on the WorkBuddy Expert Center environment. It is better suited to engineering review, preliminary scheme assessment, cost checking, and risk flagging than to replacing formal construction drawing review or statutory design sign-off. When specific numbers, standard clauses, or definitive conclusions are involved, the workflow requires checking an authoritative clause library first. If no standard source exists, the output should be marked as an empirical estimate. Users should confirm that the review scope is clear, discipline inputs are complete, and report citations are traceable.
Use Cases
- During early municipal scheme review, cross-check road, drainage, and utility conflicts and consolidate conclusions.
- Before underground utility review, scan clashes and spacing risks between existing utilities and proposed structures.
- When preparing budgets, query 31-province material unit prices and export BOQ with quota-based pricing.
- During construction plan safety review, identify potential risks and produce risk-assessment opinions with professional sign-off.
Best For
- Municipal project leads or chief engineers who need triage, conflict arbitration, and consolidated multi-discipline review.
- Cost engineers in municipal contractors or consultants who need material-price checks, quota pricing, and BOQ export.
- Safety and quality managers who need construction-plan risk identification and traceable review opinions.
- Engineering consultants or reviewers who need rapid cross-discipline review of road, drainage, geotechnical, and traffic systems.
Related Skills
Reviews Chinese-law contract text via the accurLex API, returns the full review opinion, and exports a Word document.
Generates executable FAERS active-comparator safety comparison research plans focused on one SOC or PT family.
A reference framework for financial data analysis covering statements, KPIs, visualization, and reporting templates, without executing code or collecting data.
A knowledge-base-driven advisor for weak-current, network, and telecom equipment selection, covering parameter comparison, model recommendations, compatibility checks, and budgeting.