TradingAgents A-Share Multi-Agent Investment Research Framework
Paste the following prompt into your AI chat to install this skill:
Please follow https://skillhub.cn/install/skillhub.md and install @user_371f5b95/tradingagents-astock-eant.
About this skill
Problem
When a single model analyzes an A-share ticker in one pass, it often compresses price action, sentiment, fundamentals, policy, and capital-flow evidence into a single narrative. That makes it hard to cross-check conflicting signals or explicitly apply trading constraints such as T+1, price-limit bands, and minimum order size. This skill targets a reproducible multi-agent research workflow: given a ticker and a date, it produces a Markdown report with bull/bear debate, risk debate, and a trade plan.
How It Works
The skill adapts the six-layer TradingAgents-Astock pipeline for WorkBuddy using Team/Agent orchestration:
- Parallel analysts: seven agents cover market, social, news, fundamentals, policy, hot-money, and lockup views, using westock-data or wb-finance-skill for candles, announcements, financials, dragon-tiger lists, lockups, and pledges.
- Dual LLM tiers: fast models handle parallel analysis and debate, while reasoning models synthesize research and final decisions.
- Adversarial debate: Bull and Bear researchers challenge each other, then Aggressive, Conservative, and Neutral risk debaters weigh execution risk and downside.
- A-share constraints: the Trader stage explicitly considers T+1, 10%/20%/5% price limits, 100-share lot size, trading hours, and ST flags.
Boundaries
The output is research reference, not investment advice. Reports can be affected by stale data, inconsistent definitions, or reasoning gaps. It is better used to test A-share research workflows and generate institution-style reports, not as direct position commands. Confirm the ticker, analysis date, and availability of WorkBuddy finance tools before use.
Use Cases
- For an A-share research brief, pull quotes, news, filings, policy, and flow data into a report.
- To simulate an institutional workflow, debate bull and bear cases and produce buy or sell rationale.
- When drafting a trade plan, check T+1, price limits, minimum lot size, and ST risk flags.
- For ticker review, emit a Markdown report with summary, analyst notes, risk debate, and position advice.
Best For
- Quantitative researchers validating A-share research workflows, checking agent data calls, debate, and reporting.
- WorkBuddy engineers building finance agents, reusing Team/Agent parallel orchestration and risk debate patterns.
- Structured analysts reviewing bull-bear views, organizing market, sentiment, policy, and flow evidence into debate logs.
- Research staff producing institutional-style references, expecting trade constraints and position advice in Markdown reports.
Related Skills
Reviews Chinese-law contract text via the accurLex API, returns the full review opinion, and exports a Word document.
Generates executable FAERS active-comparator safety comparison research plans focused on one SOC or PT family.
A reference framework for financial data analysis covering statements, KPIs, visualization, and reporting templates, without executing code or collecting data.
A knowledge-base-driven advisor for weak-current, network, and telecom equipment selection, covering parameter comparison, model recommendations, compatibility checks, and budgeting.