Global Fraud Examination Mastery Practice System
Paste the following prompt into your AI chat to install this skill:
Please install @user_15292d5a/yjkj-fraud-examination-mastery according to https://skillhub.cn/install/skillhub.md.
About this skill
Problem to solve
Fraud risk is often fragmented across financial processes, internal controls, tip-off records, and industry cases. Billing schemes, ghost employees, inflated revenue, and related-party transactions look different, but all can drain assets and undermine trust. This skill organizes the four ACFE CFE domains, the 2026 global occupational fraud report, China fraud audit practice, and case lessons from the ACFE founder into a searchable professional reference. It helps connect identification, investigation, legal considerations, and preventive controls.
How the skill works
It structures knowledge by fraud type, including asset misappropriation, corruption, financial statement fraud, and emerging risks. It also uses key 2026 report metrics, such as 2,402 cases, a median loss of $145,000, an average duration of 12 months, and 43% of cases detected through tips, to help prioritize leads and assess impact. The skill adds investigation and evidence points, such as integrity, chain of custody, timeliness, and legality for electronic evidence, plus the proper and limited use of Benford's law in expense, procurement, and revenue data.
Boundaries and cautions
It is suitable as a professional aid for fraud examination, internal audit, compliance investigation, and risk management, but it does not replace formal audit opinions, legal advice, or regulatory procedures. The sources include the 2021 CFE manual and the 2026 report, so individual cases must still be assessed against local laws, evidence status, and governance requirements. Benford's law does not apply to human-set amounts such as salary rates or capped reimbursements; a deviation should only trigger further inquiry, not a fraud conclusion.
Use Cases
- Audit teams review suspicious expense claims using Benford patterns and case clues to select high-risk samples.
- Internal audit teams evaluate fraud tips by comparing 2026 report schemes and loss metrics.
- Compliance teams assess bid-rigging risks in procurement by listing control defects and remediation actions.
- Legal and risk teams review electronic evidence by checking chain of custody and legality requirements.
Best For
- Audit managers responsible for expense and procurement controls need to identify high-risk fraud schemes quickly.
- Compliance investigators handling fraud tips need to judge evidence preservation and referral boundaries.
- Risk owners designing anti-fraud controls need to reference control measures and loss-reduction data.
- Management accountants preparing CFE or fraud training need to map ACFE frameworks to China practice.
Related Skills
Reviews Chinese-law contract text via the accurLex API, returns the full review opinion, and exports a Word document.
Generates executable FAERS active-comparator safety comparison research plans focused on one SOC or PT family.
A reference framework for financial data analysis covering statements, KPIs, visualization, and reporting templates, without executing code or collecting data.
A knowledge-base-driven advisor for weak-current, network, and telecom equipment selection, covering parameter comparison, model recommendations, compatibility checks, and budgeting.