Seven-Stage Mind Engine
Paste the following prompt into your AI chat to install this skill:
Follow https://skillhub.cn/install/skillhub.md to install @user_e86b82c7/7stage-mind-engin.
About this skill
The Specific Problem It Addresses
Many AI agents jump from an ambiguous user question directly to a single answer, skipping key assumptions, missing constraints, and under-checking risks. mind-engine turns general thinking into an executable framework: the agent diagnoses the problem, matches analytical models, asks clarifying questions, and only then compares multiple reasoned options.
How It Works and Where It Fits
The skill is organized around a seven-stage reasoning process:
- Problem diagnosis: classify the question as factual or normative, deterministic or probabilistic, one-shot or recurring, and identify stakeholders, hidden assumptions, and cognitive biases.
- Model matching: select primary and auxiliary models such as game theory, Bayesian updating, systems thinking, first principles, and decision science.
- Dialogue exploration: ask questions about goals, constraints, known information, involved parties, time horizon, risk tolerance, and prior experience.
- Hypothesis generation: produce at least three distinct paths, each tagged with conditions, possible outcomes, key risks, and methodology source.
- Exhaustive verification: check each hypothesis for ergodicity, stepwise validity, skin in the game, recursive traps, worst-case exposure, and antifragility.
- Recommendation and consolidation: deliver recommendations with reasoning chains, then record user preferences, constraints, and observed method limits.
It is useful for decision analysis, clarity-seeking, and multi-option comparison. It is less suitable for fast factual lookup, rigid procedural tasks, or situations that require one immediate answer. Without a custom knowledge base, the skill uses a generic model table; with one, users can replace or append their own methodology index.
Use Cases
- A product owner evaluating a launch decision can map stakeholders, constraints, and risk boundaries across three alternatives.
- A data analyst with unclear attribution can let the engine ask for missing signals and compare multiple hypothesis paths.
- A researcher at proposal stage can clarify the question, test hidden assumptions, and screen three viable methods.
- A support lead designing appeal rules can analyze multi-party incentives, worst-case exposure, and antifragility effects.
Best For
- A product manager making complex product decisions and needing multi-option comparisons with explicit reasoning chains.
- An operations lead who needs to turn ambiguous business questions into testable hypotheses with risk and constraint checks.
- A researcher clarifying research boundaries and hidden assumptions before choosing a method or opening a proposal.
- A product-strategy engineer designing rules for multiple users and comparing mechanisms against worst-case outcomes.
Related Skills
Provides Claw with character-library selection, switching, saving, and global SOUL.md style sync for role-based conversation.
An AIONE Agentic AI Infrastructure SDK wrapper for building production AI agents with memory, skills, workflows, and hooks.
A Python/TypeScript SDK wrapper for the DeepSeek-Reasonix native AI coding agent, with prefix-cache support.
A browser automation tool for analysts, operators, and developers that locates elements, fills forms, extracts structured content, and supports no-code scheduling and export.