AI Agent Hub
Back to skills
Seven-Stage Mind Engine icon

Seven-Stage Mind Engine

AI Agent Updated 2026.08.30

Paste the following prompt into your AI chat to install this skill:

Follow https://skillhub.cn/install/skillhub.md to install @user_e86b82c7/7stage-mind-engin.

About this skill

The Specific Problem It Addresses

Many AI agents jump from an ambiguous user question directly to a single answer, skipping key assumptions, missing constraints, and under-checking risks. mind-engine turns general thinking into an executable framework: the agent diagnoses the problem, matches analytical models, asks clarifying questions, and only then compares multiple reasoned options.

How It Works and Where It Fits

The skill is organized around a seven-stage reasoning process:

  • Problem diagnosis: classify the question as factual or normative, deterministic or probabilistic, one-shot or recurring, and identify stakeholders, hidden assumptions, and cognitive biases.
  • Model matching: select primary and auxiliary models such as game theory, Bayesian updating, systems thinking, first principles, and decision science.
  • Dialogue exploration: ask questions about goals, constraints, known information, involved parties, time horizon, risk tolerance, and prior experience.
  • Hypothesis generation: produce at least three distinct paths, each tagged with conditions, possible outcomes, key risks, and methodology source.
  • Exhaustive verification: check each hypothesis for ergodicity, stepwise validity, skin in the game, recursive traps, worst-case exposure, and antifragility.
  • Recommendation and consolidation: deliver recommendations with reasoning chains, then record user preferences, constraints, and observed method limits.

It is useful for decision analysis, clarity-seeking, and multi-option comparison. It is less suitable for fast factual lookup, rigid procedural tasks, or situations that require one immediate answer. Without a custom knowledge base, the skill uses a generic model table; with one, users can replace or append their own methodology index.

Use Cases

  • A product owner evaluating a launch decision can map stakeholders, constraints, and risk boundaries across three alternatives.
  • A data analyst with unclear attribution can let the engine ask for missing signals and compare multiple hypothesis paths.
  • A researcher at proposal stage can clarify the question, test hidden assumptions, and screen three viable methods.
  • A support lead designing appeal rules can analyze multi-party incentives, worst-case exposure, and antifragility effects.

Best For

  • A product manager making complex product decisions and needing multi-option comparisons with explicit reasoning chains.
  • An operations lead who needs to turn ambiguous business questions into testable hypotheses with risk and constraint checks.
  • A researcher clarifying research boundaries and hidden assumptions before choosing a method or opening a proposal.
  • A product-strategy engineer designing rules for multiple users and comparing mechanisms against worst-case outcomes.