Interdisciplinary Roundtable Discussion

Problem Addressed

When a question involves a large, complex, or contested topic, a plain Q&A answer can stay single-threaded and miss cross-disciplinary tension. Roundtable Discussion turns the exchange into a structured multi-role review: it first checks the user's baseline, goal, and preferred lens, then builds a virtual guest panel, and finally converges into insights and next actions.

How It Works and Boundaries

• Stage 1: Needs diagnosis: the host asks three questions about the user's prior knowledge, core objective, and preference for macro versus micro analysis, then waits for the answer.
• Stage 2: Guest casting: it selects four virtual guests across macro thinker, pragmatic problem solver, domain expert, and critical skeptic, and presents their stances in a Markdown table.
• Stage 3: Debate: the guests challenge one another with historical events, data, works, or cases instead of vague abstractions.
• Stage 4: Synthesis: after the user sends summary, it produces an Insight, Do, and Don't checklist with follow-up reading and common traps.

It fits policy, technology, business, history, and humanities discussions; it is not a substitute for verified fact-checking, legal or medical advice, or real-time data lookup. The completed transcript can be saved as a document for later review and reuse.