Social Science Academic Expression and Genre Style Refiner

Problem it addresses

Chinese writing for social science, education, and music research often turns experience into overconfident conclusions, treats classroom observation as subjective judgment, or writes public articles in a thesis voice. The issue is usually not only awkward phrasing; it is unclear genre standards: a review should organize claims around a question, a paper should make evidence traceable, and a public article should lower the reading threshold without emptying the content. Academic Expression Style Refiner turns these issues into diagnosable, reusable revision rules.

How it works

The skill first identifies the task and target genre, then applies prioritized diagnostics instead of producing a one-off rewrite. Core capabilities include:
- Academic expression diagnosis: detects vague concepts, weak argument chains, overclaimed evidence, and casual or promotional tone.
- Genre routing: distinguishes Journal Article, Thesis, Proposal, WeChat Public Article, Data Reporting, and Interview Analysis modes.
- Explanatory revision: each substantive suggestion states the problem type, reason, revision logic, and a transferable rule.
- Output modes: supports Quick Fix, Diagnostic, Line-by-Line, Teaching, Genre Switch, and Example Learning.
When users provide data, interviews, or classroom observations, it checks sample size, source, time range, statistical basis, quotation boundaries, and the difference between description and inference.

Limits

It is useful for revision, diagnosis, genre switching, and writing training, not for generating research materials. It should not fabricate data, interviews, field notes, or citations, nor package marketing copy as peer-reviewed claims. If the goal is full ghostwriting or close copying of another article, the user’s own responsibility and voice should remain visible.