Litigation Intake Assessment

Problem Solved

Before filing, the hard part is not drafting pleadings but turning client narratives, contracts, chat logs, and fragmented evidence into reviewable legal reasoning. Litigation Intake Assessment is aimed at mainland China dispute-resolution lawyers. It combines S1 element extraction with S4 legal-relationship risk annotation, converting unstructured case facts into a structured summary, candidate causes of action, preliminary evidence review, and risk grading, then producing a report usable for internal intake decisions and client communication.

How It Works

• Structured reconstruction first: extracts parties, conduct, amounts, dates, jurisdiction, claims, and procedural issues; conflicting facts are marked to verify.
• Element extraction and risk annotation: distinguishes hard evidence from soft evidence and grades substantive, procedural, evidentiary, limitation, and recovery risks as high, medium, or low.
• CLI-assisted law and case checking: uses deli-cli to generate focused queries by dispute points rather than pasting the full case narrative; if CLI is unavailable or returns no result, it marks search limited and lowers confidence.
• Bounded quantification: scores win probability, duration, and cost before writing conclusions, with assumptions, limits, ranges, or levels, and does not fabricate statutes, case numbers, court views, or fee standards.