Word Party and Government Document Checker & Formatter

Problem

Party and government documents often fail review because of punctuation, numbering, typography, terminology, or syntax details. Manual proofreading is slow and error-prone, while ordinary formatting tools cannot judge ungrammatical sentences, logical contradictions, or inconsistent terms. This skill turns proofing into a repeatable workflow for .docx files before submission.

How It Works

It follows a four-stage process defined in SKILL.md:

• Check: a script applies rule-based checks for mixed punctuation, full-width digits, spacing, numbering continuity, and common typos; an LLM then performs semantic checks guided by check_rules.md, covering ungrammatical sentences, logical contradictions, terminology consistency, and writing conventions.
• Report: rule-based and semantic findings are merged into a Markdown report for review.
• Annotate: issues are written back as Word comments, preserving the original text for inline review.
• Format: the formatter applies GB/T 9704-2012 requirements for page setup, fonts, heading levels, page numbers, and document grid.

The typical output includes a check report, an annotated Word file, and a formatted Word file for different review stages.

Boundaries

The skill is aimed at Chinese official document formatting and writing conventions, especially when the deliverable is .docx. Formatting is generated from the original document separately from annotations to avoid XML conflicts, so the formatted file should not blindly replace the annotated file. If the document has complex structure, annotations require editorial judgment, or only a subset of checks is needed, run only the relevant stages.