Research Literature Structured Note Assistant
Paste the following prompt into your AI chat to install this skill:
Please follow https://skillhub.cn/install/skillhub.md to install @user_5b0e15d7/kf9s-dp7z-2t5m into your AI assistant.
About this skill
Problem It Targets
Research reading often stalls not because of missing information, but because the abstract, methods, conclusions, and limitations are scattered across fragments. Manual notes can easily miss limitations and future work, especially when standardizing many papers into one format.
How It Works
The skill uses a fixed workflow:
- Trigger: enabled when the message includes keywords such as literature review, paper abstract analysis, reading notes, or literature reading summary.
- Input: paste an academic abstract or passage.
- Output: produce a structured note covering research subject, methods, core innovation, main conclusions, and limitations or future work.
It is useful for quickly turning one abstract into a consistent, archivable note.
Boundaries
If the input is not academic paper text, it asks for a formal abstract. It does not replace close reading and does not retrieve papers; field quality depends on whether the source clearly states methods, conclusions, and limitations.
Use Cases
- A graduate student pastes a single abstract before drafting a literature review to obtain consistent research subject and method fields for comparison.
- A research assistant converts multiple paper abstracts into comparable conclusion and limitation fields before selecting papers for a survey report.
- An instructor turns lecture paper abstracts into fixed-template notes to check whether students include future outlook and limitations before class discussion.
- A lab member enters a conference abstract fragment to extract core innovations and methods for group meeting notes and discussion.
Best For
- Graduate students who need consistent subject, method, and limitation fields before writing a survey.
- Research assistants who need quick comparison of conclusions and outlook while screening papers.
- Instructors who need to check whether reading notes cover core structured fields.
- Lab members who need to extract innovations and methods from abstracts before group meetings.
Related Skills
Extracts an eight-layer reasoning fingerprint from scholar texts and applies a nine-module constraint to run peer review, supervision, lecturing, or panel discussion with quantitative scores and qualitative comments.
Guides users through a nine-step failure review to analyze causes, hidden gains, and controllable improvements, producing a structured Word report.
Turn a topic or outline into a structured Markdown mind map for common visualization tools.
Updates Next.js documentation based on code changes in the active branch to help maintainers review PR documentation completeness.