Senior High Entrance Essay Reviewer

Problem addressed

Essay grading for the zhongkao often suffers from inconsistent scoring, vague feedback, and revised drafts that introduce factual or logical errors. Senior High Entrance Essay Reviewer turns the review into a reproducible workflow, defaulting to the Beijing 40-point standard (36 for content and expression, 4 for handwriting).

How it works

The skill operates from structured files in references/, including scoring standards, a fact-check guide, prompt-question libraries, and analysis templates. Its main capabilities are:
- Essay review: after reading the essay, it counts length, grammar issues, and typos, then annotates each paragraph across content, language, structure, and handwriting, while checking for logical contradictions, factual citations, exaggerated numbers, and spatial consistency.
- Prompt-trend analysis: using regional files such as references/*-essay-questions.md, it organizes past and mock prompts by year, type, and focus, then produces a structured Markdown report.
- Full-mark revision: it preserves the original outline and style, removes grammatical issues, strengthens the thesis and title echoes, keeps the draft within 600-800 characters, and outputs a .docx document with revision notes, the full revised essay, and a self-check table.
- Question-bank management: it supports listing existing regional prompts, importing web-searched questions after confirmation, and manually uploaded items under a consistent [region-pinyin]-essay-questions.md naming scheme.

Boundaries

It is useful for teachers, students, and writing-review workflows, but scoring depends on the target region's standards. For non-Beijing regions, a standards file or confirmed source is needed before precise grading. Fact-checking marks uncertain items as questionable instead of asserting errors, and handwriting scores are usually assumed unless a real rubric is provided.