Gaokao Application Advisor

Problem

Gaokao application decisions often mix scores, ranks, school tier, city preferences, and major interests into guesswork. Candidates may not know which fields matter first or how to turn reach, target, and safety logic into a concrete draft list. This skill frames the consultation as a staged workflow: collect province, score, rank, subject track, and preferences, then produce structured recommendations from user-confirmed data.

How It Works

• Stepwise intake: asks for the most critical fields first, such as province, score, rank, and subject combination.
• Rank-first analysis: uses rank rather than raw score for year-to-year comparison and estimates reach, target, and safety intervals.
• School suggestions: organizes candidates by city, program strength, school type, and employment outlook, with recent rank data marked as provided or to verify.
• Health check: reviews a draft list for balanced reach/target/safety ratios, overlapping tiers, and risky choices like declining major adjustment.
• Report output: ends with a risk disclaimer and an official-data caveat.

Limits

It does not include a live admissions database and does not make the final decision. Plan changes, batch lines, subject requirements, and admission probabilities must be checked against official sources or user-confirmed data. It is useful for drafting, comparing strategies, and surfacing risks, not for exact year-specific predictions.