Contract Advisor

Contract Delivery Problems

Contract review often gets stuck on manual clause checking, weak revision history, missing cross-contract risk patterns, and model clauses that read like guidance notes instead of paste-ready terms. Word delivery can also break on Latin/East Asian font channels, fixed line spacing, page size, and table width.

Capabilities, Workflow, and Boundaries

• Review: supports full docx/pdf files and screenshot or fragment increments, using a five-step framework, an issue ledger, and dual-version model clauses.
• Drafting: covers 21 contract types with chapter-by-chapter confirmation or quick generation.
• Diff and revision: compares two versions, identifies additions/deletions/modifications and clause-effect impact, and can write native OOXML Track Changes.
• Quality gates: scripts such as protocol_gate.py and validate_model_clauses.py turn manifest checks and clause completeness checks into hard validation steps.
• Platform features: feedback loops track accepted/rejected edits, batch review aggregates common high-risk clauses, and portfolio checks compare key fields across main contracts, supplements, and exhibits.
  It is a workflow assistant, not legal advice; external legal skills can be skipped or degraded to local-only mode, while human lawyer review is a separate paid item.