Legal Assistant Pro

Problem

Many legal workflows start with scattered client facts, chat records, contracts, and evidence. The hard part is not only finding statutes, but deciding whether a matter goes to arbitration or litigation, which procedural stage is needed, and which documents and evidence should be prepared.

How It Works

legal-assistant-pro runs along two branches: litigation and non-litigation. Its core pipeline is fact mapping, legal classification, branch routing, element matching, reasoning, and document drafting. At intake, it follows an SOP to capture parties, timeline, claims, evidence, counterparty attitude, and limitation periods, then gives brief or full-form answers. Complex matters use L1/L2/L3 classification. Litigation matters first resolve jurisdiction, distinguishing arbitration from court litigation, then determine the cause of action and procedural stage. Evidence handling covers documentary evidence, electronic data, recordings, and webpage screenshots, and can filter chat text for amounts, promises, disputes, and contradictions. Non-litigation work organizes materials for contract review, drafting, legal opinions, due diligence, and legal letters.

Boundaries

It is better suited for structured intake, retrieval prompts, and drafting structure, not for replacing licensed lawyers on case strategy, arbitration or litigation risk, and final legal judgment; statutes, cases, and local rules still require verification against authoritative sources.