AI Agent Hub
Back to skills
Bid Proposal Smart Checker icon

Bid Proposal Smart Checker

Business Operations Updated 2026.08.30

Paste the following prompt into your AI chat to install this skill:

Please install @org-mbvufw6y/bid-proposal-smart-checker based on the official guide at https://skillhub.cn/install/skillhub.md.

About this skill

Specific Problems in Bid Proposal Preparation

During bidding processes, minor oversights in proposal documents can lead to disqualification, causing significant losses. Common issues include:
- Incomplete content: Missing necessary sections or attachments, such as qualification certificates or technical proposals.
- Inconsistent formatting: Chaos in fonts, headers/footers, and numbering formats, affecting evaluation perception.
- Seal and signature errors: Incorrect seal placement, missing signatures, or non-compliance with requirements.
- Response deviations: Failing to fully meet substantive requirements of bidding documents, like technical parameters or service terms.
- Common disqualification risks: Errors in bid deadlines, miscalculations, or unmet qualifications.

Manual checking is time-consuming and error-prone, especially for inexperienced bidders.

How the Bid Proposal Smart Checker Works

This skill integrates with the Shibo Tech API, leveraging nationwide bidding data to automate checks. Core capabilities include:
- Content completeness scanning: Compares bidding document requirements to check for missing chapters, attachments, and response lists.
- Format consistency validation: Uses rule engines to detect issues in document formatting, numbering, and layout.
- Seal and signature verification: Identifies seal locations and completeness, prompting compliance needs.
- Response deviation analysis: Parses proposal content against bidding terms to flag mismatches.
- Disqualification risk warnings: Based on historical data (e.g., via getZTBStructreDetail API), identifies common error patterns.

Key steps:
1. Configure API Key (environment variable BBIAO_API_KEY) to access data.
2. After user submission of proposal or bidding files, the skill calls relevant APIs (e.g., aiSearchSubmitPolling for condition parsing) to perform checks.
3. Outputs structured results, starting with conclusions (e.g., risk levels) followed by detailed checkpoints, such as:
- Project Name: Sample Project
- Risk Point: Missing seal signature
- Recommendation: Add seal and resubmit.

Limitations and Best Practices

  • Data dependency: Results rely on Shibo Tech API data with 99.99% nationwide coverage, but ensure sufficient API balance (error code 0100590006 indicates insufficient quota).
  • Manual review necessity: Automated checks are rule-based, but complex business decisions or unstructured content require human oversight.
  • Applicable scenarios: Exclusively for proposal/bidding file checks, not for unrelated content like recruitment or news.
  • Best practices:
  • Prioritize user-provided keywords and file content to avoid auto-completion errors.
  • Note default conditions in outputs, such as time range (last 30 days) and region (nationwide).
  • If issues arise, first check API configuration or refer to references/api-mapping.md.

In summary, the Bid Proposal Smart Checker combines technical tools with domain knowledge, but bidding teams should still apply professional judgment in usage.

Use Cases

  • Before submitting bidding documents, a bid specialist uses the skill to check proposal content completeness, automatically listing missing qualification certificates or technical proposal attachments.
  • After reviewing bidding documents, a project manager needs to quickly generate a response deviation report; the skill uses API data to compare proposal terms and flag mismatches.
  • A compliance team verifies seal signatures before bid deadlines; the skill automatically scans documents, identifying incorrect seal positions or omissions and providing correction suggestions.
  • A bidding analyst uses the skill to identify disqualification risks, analyzing common error patterns based on historical data (e.g., project number queries) to provide warnings.

Best For

  • A bid specialist responsible for checking format consistency of multiple bidding documents weekly, needing to avoid manual oversights that cause disqualification.
  • A project manager who requires reviewing proposal response deviations to ensure bidding documents fully meet technical requirements of bidding files.
  • A corporate compliance officer verifying proposal seal completeness to avoid legal or procedural risks.
  • A bidding data analyst using the Shibo API to analyze historical winning bid data, identifying disqualification risk points for team review.