Arshis Full-Cycle Game Design

Problems It Addresses

Game design work often breaks down in concrete handoff gaps: worldview, systems, numerics, levels, and monetization conflict with each other; documents stay conceptual and lack executable tables for engineering, art, and QA; small teams over-scope projects instead of building a playable prototype first. Arshis Full-Cycle Game Design treats those gaps as deliverable design assets rather than generic advice.

How It Works

• Document generation: covers worldview, systems, numerics, levels, UI/UX, story, and operations, producing project-style documentation plus Excel/CSV configuration templates, program/art/QA requirement notes, and Mermaid flowcharts.
• Review and optimization: checks completeness, consistency, technical/cost/time risk, player experience, and monetization, then offers competitor-informed recommendations.
• Numerics and monetization: supports attributes, growth curves, damage/resource formulas, economic loops, gacha, battle pass, subscription, skins, activity cycles, pricing strategy, and benchmark frameworks such as pay rate / ARPU / LTV.
• Concept filtering: follows a route like 10 breakpoints -> matrix generation -> 5 concepts -> novelty filter -> quality check -> scoring -> MVP plan, grades novelty across Reskin / Rule / Player behavior / Emotional levels, and regenerates concepts that miss thresholds for Originality, Gameplay Impact, Indie Feasibility, or Prototype Potential.
• Technical and indie constraints: accounts for Unity-friendly implementation, 1-5 person teams, single-screen prototypes, one memorable mechanic, and rendering / CPU / memory / network concerns.

Scope And Cautions

It is useful for drafting document skeletons, reviewing proposals, and planning early prototypes; actual engine implementation, server deployment, and live operations still require team execution. The stated quality metrics describe generation goals, not guaranteed production readiness.