Case Analysis Report: Legal Relationship Analysis Method Plus

Problem

Civil/commercial and criminal case analysis often involves scattered materials, overlapping legal relationships, and inconsistent standards for retrieving statutes, precedents, and official Q&A. This skill turns the legal relationship analysis method into a fixed workflow for extracting disputes from filings, judgments, contracts, and evidence, then producing a structured case analysis report.

Core capabilities and workflow

• Case-type routing: First distinguishes construction contract disputes, criminal cases, and other civil/commercial matters to choose the retrieval path.
• Local knowledge base first: For construction cases, it prioritizes files such as references/construction-judicial-interpretation-ii.md; for criminal cases, it can check the batch-38 Q&A first.
• Retrieval and analysis: With the recommended Huayu Yuandian MCP connector, it retrieves statutes and precedents, then applies a two-stage framework: legal relationship examination and legal application.
• Report generation: Produces a Markdown report with sections for facts, conclusions, legal-relationship analysis, statutes, cases, procedural issues, and risk notes; if no relevant official Q&A exists, that section can be omitted and the numbering adjusted.
• Follow-up interaction: After saving, it asks whether to convert to DOCX, refine the analysis with additional materials, or finish.

Boundaries and cautions

• Analysis must be based on user-provided case materials; it should not invent facts or retrieval results.
• Local knowledge base files are fixed snapshots; for formal output, verify current validity of cited provisions via MCP when available, and flag manual review if not verified.
• Precedents are usually limited to the governing province, defaulting to Zhejiang; construction cases may prioritize SPC model cases.
• Output is for reference only and does not constitute formal legal advice.