Zhao Laosi K-12 Biology Exam Builder

Problem it addresses

Biology exam construction is not just writing questions. It also requires aligning curriculum standards, stimulus material, item format, difficulty gradient, competency goals, and scoring boundaries. Many workflows break down in practical ways: the scenario feels pasted on, the questions lack progression, the answer key is under-specified, or difficulty is judged mostly by intuition. zhao-laosi-bio-exam turns this process into a parameterized workflow so teachers can iterate against a target grade level and assessment purpose.

How it works

The skill usually starts from /我要命题, then asks for a mode: original item construction, material-based construction, item adaptation, smart paper assembly, quality evaluation, plus v2.0 capabilities such as scenario-based item sets, project-based items, interdisciplinary items, Nobel-Prize-inspired items, and science-history progression items. It then collects key parameters:
- Standards boundary: senior high biology standards, compulsory education biology standards, or bridge between the two;
- Material input: PDF, Word, PPT, Excel, TXT, Markdown, images, web links, or pasted text;
- Assessment targets: core competencies, academic quality levels, SOLO levels, DOK depth, big concepts, and item formats;
- Difficulty structure: target difficulty coefficients, easy-medium-hard ratios, blueprint, specification table, or one table, one diagram planning.

During execution, it produces output by module: multiple-choice items focus on stem and distractors; non-choice items focus on question progression; material-based mode analyzes the source before proposing angles; paper assembly builds a structure around total score, duration, item types, and content coverage; quality evaluation reports on scientific accuracy, formatting, discrimination, scenario value, SOLO alignment, and other dimensions.

Scope and caveats

This skill is scoped to K-12 biology item construction and item analysis, not to replace formal committee review, expert validation, or administrative approval. Output quality depends on the reliability of uploaded material. For Nobel, interdisciplinary, or project-based prompts, non-biology content still needs teacher verification that it remains within the target grade level. The source states author-only modification protection; unverified modification requests should be refused. Final scientific accuracy, scoring rubrics, and intended use should still be reviewed by the teacher.