Guidance Wrap

Problem It Targets

When calling guidance-wrap, the friction is often not the underlying capability but direct coupling to its entry point, parameter shape, and call pattern. The docs position Guidance Wrap plainly: guidance-wrap wrapper. In other words, it does not replace guidance-wrap; it adds an outer wrapper boundary so callers can face a more stable packaging layer instead of low-level call details.

How It Works

Based on the available information, its core action is to build a wrapper around guidance-wrap. A wrapper like this typically does three things: unifying the call entry point, isolating dependency changes, and preserving the original capability boundary. It fits at the module boundary where guidance-wrap is already a dependency:
- accept external input in the wrapper instead of letting business code assemble low-level arguments
- keep the guidance-wrap call internal, making later replacement or tuning easier
- avoid assuming interfaces that are not documented for the original guidance-wrap

Scope and Caution

The listed version is 1.0.0, and the description only identifies it as a guidance-wrap wrapper. Treat it as a lightweight encapsulation layer, not a complete business-logic, orchestration, or model-routing skill. If your workflow depends on concrete endpoints, error codes, parameter tables, or sample behavior, verify the wrapper's exported API and tests before relying on it. Without that information, do not use it as a black box for higher-level problems.