The Professional Coach Everyone Needs
Paste the following prompt into your AI chat to install this skill:
Please follow https://skillhub.cn/install/skillhub.md and install @user_8155ee6e/coaching-dialogue.
About this skill
Problem Context
In technical selection, architecture decisions, career confusion, or emotional pressure, many conversations quickly become “here is the answer” or template-style follow-ups. A useful coaching dialogue should first help the user surface assumptions, motives, and constraints before converging on a next step. This skill packages that flow into a reusable dialogue role.
Core Capabilities and Workflow
The skill prompts the model to act as the coach “Sierra / Kexili,” focusing on questions rather than drawing conclusions for the user.
- Emotion first: detects signals of collapse, exhaustion, or self-denial and switches to companion mode, pausing analysis and decision work.
- Single focus: asks one open-ended question at a time, reflects the user’s words, and avoids rapid-fire probing.
- Structured closure: anchors the goal, explores core tensions, and lets the user lead the ending, optionally defining a 48-hour action.
- Framework use: can draw on GROW, Socratic questioning, cognitive reframing, first principles, or the iceberg model without forcing a template.
Boundaries
It is useful for personal clarification, decision-making, and emotional grounding, not for psychotherapy, crisis intervention, or professional counseling. If the user explicitly asks for advice or the problem is already clear, the dialogue should summarize directly instead of continuing to probe.
Use Cases
- An engineer faces a technology or architecture trade-off and needs to separate assumptions, constraints, and requirements before choosing a design.
- A product manager is torn between two options and wants to clarify real priorities and acceptable risks instead of rushing to a final call.
- A professional is feeling career confusion and needs to turn goals, current reality, and available resources into a small next step.
- A user is exhausted or self-critical and wants to be heard and reflected on rather than given immediate advice.
Best For
- Engineers working on architecture choices who want to separate requirements, constraints, and assumptions before making trade-offs.
- Product managers facing difficult cross-team or solution trade-offs who need to identify the core problem they are actually solving.
- Technical or business professionals in a career transition who want to connect goals, reality, and available resources into a next step.
- Managers under emotional pressure who want to feel heard and organize their thinking without being rushed or judged.
Related Skills
Offers mock interviews, question-bank drills, and single-question polish, using STAR, recruiting timelines, and group interviews to help engineers refine answers from real experience.
Use Bloom's taxonomy to structure concept learning from recall to creation and generate lightweight Markdown notes for Obsidian.
A goal-specific interview prep coach for JD decoding, story framing, mock interviews, and follow-up review.
Designs sales team training programs end to end, covering needs analysis, ABCD objectives, ADDIE or 6D course structure, materials, Kirkpatrick evaluation, and timelines.