Media Fighter

Problem

News drafts often stall for three reasons: material is scattered across chat, links, and screenshots; facts lack sources; and the final copy drifts into commentary or promotional tone. This skill targets event-to-report writing, producing a verifiable material file and a fact-led body draft.

How It Works

The workflow splits into two user-controlled stages:

• Stage A: Material Gathering: it creates a [topic]-material.md file and classifies inputs into confirmed facts, items to verify, gaps, and spatiotemporal context. It then fills gaps with public sources, attaching a citation to each item; if nothing is found, it marks no public information found instead of relying on vague phrases.
• Closed-Loop Check: after each round, it asks whether the material supports a coherent reading of the event rather than a list of statements.
• Stage B: Drafting: it orders the confirmed material into lead, key facts, context, stakeholder views, and next steps, then writes a [topic]-draft.md. The style rules favor short sentences, plain language, cited claims, and minimal rhetorical emphasis.

Boundaries

It is suited for news writing, briefs, and factual event reports, not for commentary, columns, PR copy, or advertising. Output quality depends on the initial facts the user provides and whether public sources can fill the five Ws. If a section lacks evidence, the workflow should return to Stage A rather than patching the body draft directly.