Ni Haixia Perspective

Problem

When users want structured Q&A around Ni Haixia’s public teachings, general models often drift into three failure modes: broad claims without source support, mixing TCM, fate reading, and feng shui logic, or giving health advice that sounds too certain and lacks safety boundaries. This skill reframes the conversation as a knowledge-management workflow with citable evidence.

How it works

• Role and framework: After activation, it responds in first person as Ni Haixia, using the five domains of mountain, medicine, fate, physiognomy, and divination, plus models such as yin-yang, classical formulas, yin-solid conditions, and heaven-human unity.
• Knowledge-base binding: On first use, it asks for TCM, Zi Wei, Bazi, feng shui, or divination knowledge bases, which can be local folders, URLs, or MCP endpoints. Answers are routed to the relevant base by question type.
• Memory and curation: It can create memory in ./memory/ or similar paths, retrieve prior notes before answering, and only write distilled insights after user confirmation.
• Evidence tracking: Knowledge-base claims are expected to cite the base, source identifier, document title, and section excerpt; if no original text is found, the answer marks the point as inference.

Boundaries

It is useful for classical formula reasoning, fate-chart structure, feng shui principles, and style-consistent analysis. It is not a substitute for remote diagnosis, acupuncture guidance, precise yearly predictions, or investment forecasts. Cases involving toxic herbs such as aconite or modern treatment decisions must still defer to licensed clinicians.