AI Agent Hub
Back to skills
Cybersecurity Skills Wrap icon

Cybersecurity Skills Wrap

IT Ops & Security Updated 2026.08.30

Paste the following prompt into your AI chat to install this skill:

Please install @user_922b1001/cybersecurity-skills-wrap according to https://skillhub.cn/install/skillhub.md.

About this skill

What problem it addresses

When AI agents perform security analysis, detection response, compliance mapping, or threat-intelligence tasks, plain prompts often lack stable structure. Models may produce generic advice that is hard to align with frameworks such as MITRE ATT&CK and NIST CSF 2.0, and harder still to audit or reproduce. Cybersecurity Skills Wrap is not a single point tool. It organizes cybersecurity capabilities into structured skills that agents can call, reducing the translation cost between security-domain language and actionable steps.

How the skill works

The package is a Python wrapper containing 754 structured cybersecurity skills, mapped to five frameworks:

  • MITRE ATT&CK: alignment with tactics, techniques, and procedures.
  • NIST CSF 2.0: governance, identify, protect, detect, respond, and recover contexts.
  • ATLAS: threat modeling for OT/ICS environments.
  • D3FEND: mapping defensive technologies and countermeasures.
  • NIST AI RMF: AI system risk-management perspective.

Typical use cases include asking an agent to analyze a malware sample, assess an attack chain, or map log alerts to ATT&CK techniques. The wrap layer selects the relevant skills and returns structured output, which is useful when teams need framework-aligned phrasing, automated orchestration, or a shared security vocabulary.

Boundaries and notes

This is a skill wrapper and mapping layer, not a replacement for EDR, SIEM, SOC tooling, or human investigation. Output quality depends on input data, model capability, and task context. For production incident response, retain human review, least privilege, and evidence-chain auditing. When the task requires live threat intelligence, private asset topology, or compliance forensics, treat it as a context-structuring tool rather than a final decision system.

Use Cases

  • SOC analysts map SIEM alerts to MITRE ATT&CK techniques and produce structured triage notes.
  • Security architects align existing controls with NIST CSF 2.0 and D3FEND to produce gap lists.
  • OT engineers use ATLAS for ICS threat scenarios to organize attack chains and defense guidance.
  • AI security engineers structure model risk reviews using NIST AI RMF as a common checklist.

Best For

  • SOC analysts who need alert-to-ATT&CK mapping
  • Security architects who need NIST CSF 2.0 control mapping
  • AI application developers building cybersecurity agents
  • Security engineers responsible for OT/ICS threat modeling