Construction Dispute Q&A and Case Search Plus

Problem Addressed

Construction project contract disputes often hinge on three layers: how a contract clause is drafted, which judicial interpretation applies, and how courts actually decide. This skill frames the issue around Supreme Court Construction Interpretation II, Interpretation I, and the Civil Code, then outputs a structured response: summary, detailed analysis, case references, procedure notes, and other cautions.

How It Works

• Rule-first analysis: It searches the bundled interpretation files, prioritizing Interpretation II where it applies to newly accepted first-instance cases.
• Case mapping: It selects 5 cases, preferring Supreme Court model cases and then using Huayu Yuandian MCP to find judgments citing the relevant interpretation, with case numbers or source labels where possible.
• Jurisdiction check: If the project location is missing, it flags the need to confirm the court's specialized jurisdiction, since construction disputes are usually assigned by the location of the project.
• Conflict handling: When the two interpretations differ, it marks the conflict and explains the applicable rule under the newer interpretation.

Boundary and Caution

This skill supports legal research, article comparison, and case organization, but it does not replace counsel's fact investigation, evidence review, or litigation strategy. Issues around case acceptance timing, contract validity, priority payment rights, and worker wages still require checking the governing court, contract documents, and evidence.